Key result
A soft tissue elastography robotic arm system successfully determined in situ layer-specific mechanical properties of tissue phantoms with 7-10% relative error and intact porcine stomach.
A novel soft tissue elastography robotic arm system successfully characterized layer-specific nonlinear material properties of soft tissue in situ with low relative error.
In this paper, we report the development of a technique to characterize layer-specific nonlinear material properties of soft tissue in situ with the potential for in vivo testing. A soft tissue elastography robotic arm system comprising of a robotically manipulated 30 MHz high-resolution ultrasound probe, a custom designed compression head, and load cells has been developed to perform compression ultrasound imaging on the target tissue and measure reaction forces. A multilayer finite element model is iteratively optimized to identify the material coefficients of each layer. Validation has been performed using tissue mimicking agar-based phantoms with a low relative error of ~7% for two-layer phantoms and ~10% error for three layer phantoms when compared to known ground-truth values obtained using a commercial material testing system. The technique has then been used to successfully determine the in situ layer-specific mechanical properties of intact porcine stomach. The mean C 10 and C 20 for a second-order reduced polynomial material model were determined for the muscularis (6.41 ± 0.60, 4.29 ± 1.87 kPa), submucosal (5.21 ± 0.57, 3.68 ± 3.01 kPa), and mucosal layers (0.06 ± 0.02, 0.09 ± 0.24 kPa). Such a system can be utilized to perform in vivo mechanical characterization, which is left as future work.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dargar et al. (2016) studied this question. Soft tissue elastography robotic arm system vs. Commercial material testing system was evaluated on Relative error of material coefficients compared to ground-truth. A soft tissue elastography robotic arm system successfully determined in situ layer-specific mechanical properties of tissue phantoms with 7-10% relative error and intact porcine stomach.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: