Key result
TAVI shows similar risk of prosthetic valve endocarditis compared to SAVR.
Why the study?
Prosthetic valve endocarditis is a rare but serious complication after aortic valve replacement, motivating a review of clinical profiles and outcomes following TAVI versus SAVR.
Does transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) compared to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) affect the incidence, profile, and outcomes of prosthetic valve endocarditis?
Meta-Analysis (n=13,221)
Does transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) compared to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) affect the incidence, profile, and outcomes of prosthetic valve endocarditis?
Relative Risk: 1 (95% CI 0.79–1.27)
Absolute Event Rate: 1.05% vs 1.01%
p-value: p=0.98
TAVI and SAVR have similar overall incidences of prosthetic valve endocarditis, but TAVI is associated with more early infections and different causative organisms, while SAVR patients more frequently require surgical intervention for PVE.
Similar PVE incidence with TAVI versus SAVR supports equivalent infectious risk; extends pooled RCT and cohort evidence for valve selection.
Prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) is a rare but serious complication following aortic valve replacement using either a transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). This study aims to review the profiles and outcomes of PVE after surgical versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Electronic searches were performed on Scopus, EMBASE, and PubMed to retrieve related articles. To be included, study designs had to be randomized controlled trials (RCT) or observational cohort studies (in English) with PVE patients that compared differences based on TAVI or SAVR. This review included data for 13,221 patients with PVE diagnoses. Of those, 2,109 patients had an initial SAVR, and 11,112 patients had an initial TAVI. There was no difference in the incidence of PVE in patients who had initial TAVI versus SAVR (1.05% versus 1.01% per person-year, p=0.98). However, the onset of early PVE was more frequently observed in the TAVI group (risk ratio (RR): 1.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.14, 2.08], p=0.005). Patients in the TAVI group had a lower indication for surgery to treat PVE when compared to SAVR (RR: 0.55, 95%CI [0.44, 0.69], p<0.001). Staphylococcus aureus was more likely to be the source of PVE in patients who had previous TAVI (RR: 1.34, 95%CI [1.17, 1.54], p<0.001). Also, Enterococcus faecalis was more frequently observed as a cause of PVE in the TAVI group (RR: 1.49, 95%CI [1.21, 1.82], p<0.001). Patients who underwent SAVR and TAVI had similar incidences of PVE. However, patients who underwent SAVR had a greater indication for surgery to treat PVE, while those who underwent TAVI had higher comorbidities, a higher likelihood of early PVE, and a trend towards higher one-year mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Monaci et al. (2024) conducted a meta-analysis in Prosthetic valve endocarditis (n=13,221). Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) vs. Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) was evaluated on Incidence of prosthetic valve endocarditis (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.79-1.27, p=0.98). Transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical aortic valve replacement had similar incidence rates of prosthetic valve endocarditis (1.05% vs 1.01% per person-year; RR 1.00).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: