Key result
TAVR had a similar incidence of prosthetic valve endocarditis compared to SAVR (5.21 vs 4.10 per 1000 person-years; incident rate ratio 1.27, 95% CI 0.70-2.32, P=0.44).
Why the study?
Prosthetic valve endocarditis is a rare but critical cause of valve failure and death after TAVR and SAVR, warranting further analysis of its incidence, risk factors, and outcomes in modern experience.
Does TAVR compared to SAVR alter the incidence of prosthetic valve endocarditis in patients with severe aortic stenosis?
Population
8530 patients with severe aortic stenosis in PARTNER 1 and 2 trials and registries
Comparison
TAVR vs SAVR
Design
Pooled cohort analysis of trials and registries
Follow-up
Mean 2.69±1.55 years
Authors
Loading...
Similar endocarditis rates should not yet influence TAVR versus SAVR selection; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
Cohort (n=8,530)
Yes
Does TAVR compared to SAVR alter the incidence of prosthetic valve endocarditis in patients with severe aortic stenosis?
Relative Risk: 1.27 (95% CI 0.7–2.32)
Absolute Event Rate: 5.21% vs 4.1%
p-value: p=0.44
Prosthetic valve endocarditis remains a rare but highly fatal complication after aortic valve replacement, with no significant difference in incidence, predictors, or temporal risk between TAVR and SAVR.
Summers et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Severe aortic stenosis (n=8,530). TAVR vs. SAVR was evaluated on Incidence of prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) (incident rate ratio 1.27, 95% CI 0.70-2.32, p=0.44). TAVR had a similar incidence of prosthetic valve endocarditis compared to SAVR (5.21 vs 4.10 per 1000 person-years; incident rate ratio 1.27, 95% CI 0.70-2.32, P=0.44).