Examines derailment risks in heavy-haul trains, indicating critical alignment of forces and geometry.
Curved sections of track are recognised as critical high-risk zones for heavy-haul train (HHT) derailments. To better understand derailment mechanisms under braking and release events and to support effective derailment mitigation strategies, a unified safety evaluation framework was constructed. This framework integrates a pneumatic braking model, a longitudinal–vertical coupled HHT dynamics model, and a quasi-static lateral mechanics model, validated by field data. Using this framework, the running safety of a 10,000-ton HHT negotiating S-curves was systematically examined. The analysis shows that longitudinal impulses during release are considerably more pronounced than those during braking, resulting in elevated lateral coupler forces that heighten derailment risk. Further investigation demonstrates this risk is primarily driven by the spatiotemporal alignment between longitudinal impulses and lateral curve geometry. A critical condition emerges when peak impulses align with small-radius segments, producing a compounded effect of high lateral force and unfavourable geometry that sharply increases the derailment coefficient. Additionally, excessive superelevation caused by reduced speeds during final braking is identified as an independent additional risk factor. These insights provide a technical foundation for reducing derailment risks on mountainous heavy-haul railways.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: