Demonstrates systemic wind power forecast uncertainty in Korea, indicating a need for coordinated management.
Rapid wind power expansion is vital for global decarbonization, yet its supply uncertainty challenges grid stability. While forecasting can mitigate variability, how multidimensional forecast errors co-vary across interconnected systems remains unclear. Here we develop a framework integrating retrospective statistical diagnosis with forward-looking network modeling to characterize wind power uncertainty along higher-order dimensions – volatility, skewness, and kurtosis – and trace systemic co-dependence through spatially heterogeneous networks. When applied to hourly forecast data from the Republic of Korea’s major wind regions, the framework reveals heavy-tailed error distributions and asymmetric co-dependence. Daily volatility concentrates in dominant sources while extreme risks are distributed across multi-polar hubs, assigning regions differentiated roles as transmitters, receivers, or peripheral nodes. These findings demonstrate that wind power uncertainty is a systemic phenomenon requiring coordinated management rather than isolated forecasting improvements. The framework provides a generalizable toolkit for grid operations, risk-informed investment, and policy design, accelerating a resilient, cost-effective renewable transition. Wind power forecast uncertainty in Korea is systemic. Heavy-tailed forecast errors co-vary through asymmetric networks, with volatility centralized in one hub and extreme risks distributed across multiple nodes, requiring coordinated management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: