PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 12, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Comparative Study of Explainable AI Techniques for Lung Cancer Nodule Classification

View Full Paper
PIPavan Kumar IllaSRM Institute of Science and Technology

Key Points

  • The central aim is to compare the effectiveness of three explainable AI techniques for classifying lung cancer nodules.
  • Conducted a systematic comparative analysis of Grad-CAM, SHAP, and LIME on a ResNet-50 model.
  • Evaluated performance using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and accuracy metrics.
  • Measured explanation quality and computational efficiency quantitatively, focusing on Intersection over Union (IoU).
  • Achieved AUC of 0.84 and accuracy of 0.7946 for lung nodule detection using deep learning.
  • Identified differences in localization behavior and explanation time among the XAI techniques tested.
  • Found trade-offs between interpretability accuracy and computational efficiency for implementing these systems in clinical settings.

Abstract

Abstract—Lung cancer is also among the most common causesof cancer death across the globe where early detection using computed tomography (CT) is of great help in improving sur-vival rates. Deep learning models have shown excellent results in automated detection of lung nodules, but they are black-box, which makes them less interpretable and less trustable by clinicians. This paper provides a systematic comparativeanalysis of three popular explainable artificial intelligence (XAI)methods, namely, Grad-CAM, SHAP, and LIME, on a nodulevs. non-nodule convolutional neural network of the ResNet-50.The model suggested a value of the area under curve receiveroperating characteristic (AUC) and accuracy of 0.84 and 0.7946respectively. The quality of the explanation process was measuredquantitatively in terms of Intersection over Union (IoU) andcomputational efficiency. Measurable differences in localizationbehaviour and explanation time across the XAI methods arefound as a result of experimental results. The results suggest thatthere are trade-offs existing between interpretability accuracyand computational efficiency to implement explainable deeplearning systems in clinical lung imaging systems.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pavan Kumar Illa (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2ba3d18101cf8926f025edhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20626491
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Explainable AI for Early Lung Cancer Detection: A Path to Confidence2024 · 4 citations
  2. 2Deep Learning-Based Lung Cancer Classification and Grad-Cam With Lime-Supported Explainability Analysis2026
  3. 3Towards Transparent AI for Lung Cancer Diagnosis: A Dual-Pipeline Explainable Framework Using Clinical and CT Imaging Data2026
  4. 4Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging: A Case Study on Enhancing Lung Cancer Detection through CT Images2024 · 16 citations
  5. 5A critical review of explainable deep learning in lung cancer diagnosis2025 · 10 citations