Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Early and accurate detection of pulmonary nodules in computed tomography (CT) imaging is critical for reducing lung cancer mortality. Although deep learning-based computer-aided detection (CAD) systems have demonstrated promis-ing diagnostic performance, their widespread clinical adoption has been impeded by two persistent limitations: the absence of visual explainability and the lack of deployable end-to-end interfaces that integrate prediction, explanation, and clinical workflow. This paper presents an explainable, end-to-end CAD system for pulmonary nodule classification that addresses both shortcomings. The proposed system employs a transfer-learned ResNet-50 architecture, fine-tuned on 2,372 balanced CT patches extracted from the publicly available LUNA16 dataset. Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) is integrated into the inference pipeline to generate per-prediction heatmaps that visually localize the discriminative regions driv-ing each classification decision. The complete system is deployed as a production-grade web application featuring a FastAPI backend and a React frontend, complete with authentication and database persistence. On a held-out test set of 356 samples, the proposed system achieves an accuracy of 90.45%, precision of 90.91%, recall of 89.89%, F1 score of 90.40%, and an AUC-ROC of 0.9615. A confidence-based abstention mechanism returns an “Inconclusive” verdict for predictions below a 60% probability threshold, reducing the risk of unreliable automated decisions. Rather than claiming state-of-the-art raw accuracy, this work’s principal contribution is demonstrating that competitive classification performance, real-time visual explainability, and a fully deployed, browser-accessible clinical interface can be integrated into a single reproducible, open-source system, contributing a practical baseline for future hospital validation studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Das et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: