This randomized trial investigates heat transfer in a ventilated cavity with heat sources, suggesting implications for building energy systems.
This work investigates heat transfer experimentally and numerically within a ventilated cavity, both with and without an internal heat source, simulating a room with a person at the interior at 1:3 scale. This setup has applications in building energy systems, cooling of electronic equipment, solar energy collectors, etc. The experimental configuration consists of a cube in which the left vertical wall is subjected to a uniform heat flux, and the opposing wall is maintained at a constant temperature. A rectangular parallelepiped heat source was placed inside. The remaining walls are thermally insulated, and air is the thermal fluid. Air enters and exits through square ports on the top surface. Experimental temperature profiles were recorded at multiple depths and heights. Corresponding numerical results for temperature fields, flow patterns, turbulent viscosity, and turbulent kinetic energy were generated using the Ansys Fluent 18 CFD software, with six turbulence models assessed against experimental data under steady-state conditions. A key finding is that the Nusselt number and the convective heat transfer coefficients (average) for the hot wall remain negligibly affected by the incorporation or status (on/off) of a heat source at the interior of the cavity, the biggest temperature difference (experimental vs numerical) corresponds to the rkε model with 6.2% when there is no thermal source in the cavity and the lowest difference for the average convective heat transfer coefficient is with the rslrso model with 5.2%.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Piña-Ortiz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: