Why the study?
Does a multicomponent exercise training intervention improve psychological responses and exercise adherence in patients with heart failure?
Does a multicomponent exercise training intervention improve psychological responses and exercise adherence in patients with heart failure?
A multicomponent exercise training intervention improves self-efficacy in heart failure patients, with high adherence associated with improved depression and confusion scores.
Supports exercise to improve self-efficacy and adherence-linked mood in heart failure; extends RCT evidence for psychological benefits in cardiac rehabilitation.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to describe psychological effects and exercise adherence during a multicomponent exercise training intervention. METHODS: A sample of 42 patients with heart failure were randomized into an exercise (INV) group (n = 22) and an attention control (AC) group (n = 20). The exercise protocol included two 12-week phases, a structured phase and a self-managed phase. The psychological responses assessed were mood states and exercise self-efficacy. To meet the second purpose of the study, the exercise group was dichotomized based on the number of sessions completed to create two adherence subgroups. FINDINGS: Results indicate self-efficacy improved for the INV group and was maintained during the self-management phase. The adherence subgroups demonstrated different patterns for weekly exercise. Depression and confusion scores improved for the high-adherence group in contrast to worsening for the low-adherence group. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest a need for further study of the psychological responses of exercise adherence for patients with heart failure. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The study indicates the importance of continuous assessment of exercise participation and longer term adherence support for patients with heart failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Duncan et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: