Why the study?
Tele-cardiac rehabilitation is recommended to enhance exercise tolerance, but limited digital literacy in older adults impedes implementation. Delivering it within community congregation facilities may overcome these challenges.
Does tele-cardiac rehabilitation delivered in community congregation facilities improve exercise tolerance and physical performance in older adults?
Comparison
Tele-cardiac rehabilitation vs usual care
Design
Cluster-assigned controlled study
Follow-up
20 weeks
Key result
Tele-cardiac rehabilitation in community facilities improved peak oxygen uptake (13.1 to 14.4 ml/kg/min; interaction p=0.017) and SPPB scores (10.2 to 11.3; interaction p=0.024) vs usual care.
Authors
Loading...
Tele-cardiac rehabilitation improves peakVO2 in older adults; extends evidence for remote programs in community settings.
RCT (n=57)
Cluster-assigned
Yes
Does tele-cardiac rehabilitation delivered in community congregation facilities improve exercise tolerance and physical performance in older adults?
p-value: p=0.017
Tele-cardiac rehabilitation delivered in community facilities significantly improves exercise tolerance and lower limb function in older adults, offering a feasible way to overcome digital literacy barriers.
Tamura et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Frailty and cardiovascular disease risk (n=57). Tele-cardiac rehabilitation vs. Usual care was evaluated on Peak oxygen uptake (peakVO2) and Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) scores (p=0.017). Tele-cardiac rehabilitation in community facilities improved peak oxygen uptake (13.1 to 14.4 ml/kg/min; interaction p=0.017) and SPPB scores (10.2 to 11.3; interaction p=0.024) vs usual care.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: