Key result
NSTEMI clinical severity decreases over time while STEMI severity stagnates or worsens.
Why the study?
No prior study in Norway had explored temporal changes in AMI characteristics and severity amidst declining AMI incidence and improved survival.
Population
74 677 incident AMI patients aged ≥20 years in Norway
Comparison
Temporal changes from 2013 to 2021
Design
Registry-based observational study
Authors
Loading...
Declining CS rates in AMI may reflect care advances; leaves open drivers amid shifting risk profiles.
Observational (n=74,677)
Yes
Between 2013 and 2021 in Norway, clinical severity indicators decreased among NSTEMI patients but remained stable or worsened among STEMI patients, highlighting divergent temporal patterns.
Longva et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (n=74,677). Temporal trends (2013-2021) vs. Earlier years (2013) was evaluated on Temporal changes in AMI characteristics and severity indicators. From 2013 to 2021, clinical severity indicators such as cardiogenic shock decreased among NSTEMI patients, whereas they changed little or worsened among STEMI patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: