Why the study?
Cardiometabolic disease risk profiles in youth had not yet been characterized using the new obesity definitions set by The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology Commission.
Do total, regional, and ectopic adipose tissue fat content and diabetes risk factors differ across Lancet Commission obesity phenotypes in Latino youth with BMI ≥95th percentile?
Population
117 Latino youth (12-16 y) with obesity (BMI≥95th%)
Comparison
Clinical Obesity vs Preclinical Obesity vs No Obesity phenotypes
Design
Cross-sectional analysis of baseline trial data
Key result
Clinical and preclinical obesity in Latino youth were associated with higher BMI%, waist circumference, fat mass, and subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue compared to no obesity (all p<0.05).
Authors
Loading...
Refines obesity phenotyping in Latino youth; leaves open whether clinical obesity improves cardiometabolic risk prediction.
Cross-Sectional (n=117)
Do total, regional, and ectopic adipose tissue fat content and diabetes risk factors differ across Lancet Commission obesity phenotypes in Latino youth with BMI ≥95th percentile?
p-value: p=<0.05
The Lancet Commission obesity definitions effectively stratify cardiometabolic risk and adiposity profiles among Latino youth with BMI ≥95th percentile.
SHEPARD et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Obesity (n=117). Clinical Obesity and Preclinical Obesity vs. No Obesity was evaluated on Total, regional, and ectopic adipose tissue fat content and diabetes risk factors (p=<0.05). Clinical and preclinical obesity in Latino youth were associated with higher BMI%, waist circumference, fat mass, and subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue compared to no obesity (all p<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: