Key result
Transcatheter ASD closure linked to ~27% lower risk of new-onset AF/AFL vs. surgery.
Why the study?
Atrial fibrillation/flutter is a common long-term complication after atrial septal defect closure, prompting a comparison of new-onset arrhythmias and clinical outcomes between surgical and device closure.
Does transcatheter device closure reduce the incidence of new-onset atrial fibrillation/flutter compared to surgical closure in adults undergoing atrial septal defect closure?
Cohort (n=11,133)
Yes
Does transcatheter device closure reduce the incidence of new-onset atrial fibrillation/flutter compared to surgical closure in adults undergoing atrial septal defect closure?
In adults undergoing ASD closure, transcatheter device closure is associated with a lower long-term risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation/flutter and all-cause mortality compared to surgical closure, though it carries a higher risk of ischemic stroke.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Device closure linked to lower AF/AFL; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF/AFL) is a common long-term complication after atrial septal defect (ASD) closure. We compared the incidence of new-onset AF/AFL and clinical outcomes between surgical and device closure. Using the Korean National Health Insurance Service database (2009–2021), we identified adults undergoing ASD closure without prior atrial arrhythmias. The primary outcome was new-onset AF/AFL. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, ischemic stroke, and catheter ablation. Propensity score (PS) matching was performed to minimize confounding. Among 11,133 patients (3,747 surgical; 7,386 device), 6,310 were included in the PS-matched cohort. During a median follow-up of 5.5 years, the device closure group showed a significantly lower risk of AF/AFL (hazard ratio [HR], 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59–0.91) and all-cause mortality (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.52–0.81) compared to the surgical group in the matched cohort. Conversely, the device group was associated with a higher risk of ischemic stroke (HR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.13–1.98). Catheter ablation for AFL was performed significantly more frequently in the surgical group (12.0% vs. 3.5%, p=0.048). Surgical closure, male sex, heart failure and older age at closure were associated with higher risk of AF/AFL after ASD closure. Among ASD patients without prior AF/AFL, device closure was associated with lower long-term AF/AFL, whereas AFL ablation was performed more frequently after surgical closure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Atrial septal defect (n=11,133). Transcatheter device closure vs. Surgical closure was evaluated on New-onset atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF/AFL) (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.59-0.91). Transcatheter device closure of atrial septal defect was associated with a lower risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation or flutter compared to surgical closure.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: