Key result
Application of modified Lake Louise Criteria with T1/T2 mapping identified non-ischaemic myocardial injury in all 4 patients with acute immune checkpoint inhibitor myocarditis.
Why the study?
Data were limited on applying cardiovascular magnetic resonance-based modified Lake Louise Criteria with relaxometry techniques to diagnose immune checkpoint inhibitor-related myocarditis.
Does cardiovascular magnetic resonance with modified Lake Louise Criteria including T1/T2 mapping identify acute immune checkpoint inhibitor-related myocarditis?
Case Report (n=4)
No
Does cardiovascular magnetic resonance with modified Lake Louise Criteria including T1/T2 mapping identify acute immune checkpoint inhibitor-related myocarditis?
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance using modified Lake Louise Criteria, particularly native T1 mapping, is a useful non-invasive tool for diagnosing acute immune checkpoint inhibitor-related myocarditis and monitoring treatment response.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports CMR with modified Lake Louise Criteria for ICI myocarditis diagnosis; hypothesis-generating, requiring larger prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved outcomes for many types of cancer. However, ICI therapies are associated with the development of myocarditis, an immune-mediated adverse event associated with a high mortality rate. Therefore, prompt diagnosis and early intervention are of outmost importance. There is limited data on the application of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR)-based modified Lake Louise Criteria (mLLC) with the use of relaxometry techniques for the diagnosis of ICI myocarditis. CASE SUMMARY: Four cancer patients undergoing ICI treatment presented with various clinical symptoms and troponin elevation to emergency/ambulatory clinics within 10-21 days after ICI initiation. On the suspicion of possible ICI-related myocarditis all patients underwent CMR within a few days after admission. Applying mLLC including relaxometry techniques, all patients met 'non-ischaemic injury criteria', while 3/4 patients met 'oedema criteria'. In most patients, quantitative mapping revealed substantially increased T1 values, while T2 values were only mildly increased or normal. In two patients with follow-up, CMR demonstrated improvement in findings after immunosuppressive treatment. However, there was only limited agreement between the degree of high-sensitive troponin levels and T1/T2 levels. DISCUSSION: The application of mLLC with T1/T2 mapping appears useful in the CMR diagnosis of acute ICI myocarditis with non-ischaemic myocardial injury criteria being the most common finding. The sensitivity of native T1 appears higher than T2 mapping in the acute diagnosis as well as in the assessment of treatment response. As troponin elevations may persist for some time with ICI myocarditis, CMR may represent an alternate strategy to monitor treatment response.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wintersperger et al. (2022) conducted a case report in Immune checkpoint inhibitor-related myocarditis (n=4). Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance using modified Lake Louise Criteria was evaluated on Presence of non-ischaemic myocardial injury criteria and oedema criteria by modified Lake Louise Criteria. Application of modified Lake Louise Criteria with T1/T2 mapping identified non-ischaemic myocardial injury in all 4 patients with acute immune checkpoint inhibitor myocarditis.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: