Assesses cognitive workload in junior surgeons during robotic colorectal surgery, suggesting safe training avenues.
BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted colorectal surgery (RAS) is increasingly adopted; however, surgeon workload during supervised training and its determinants remain unclear. METHODS: We conducted a single-center study combining a prospective surgical task load index (Surgical-TLX) assessment and a retrospective cohort analysis (October 2023-August 2025). Junior surgeons were defined as non-Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery (JSES)-certified surgeons who had < 10 robot-assisted colorectal cases as the primary operator and were within 8 years after graduation. All junior cases were performed under direct supervision by JSES-certified surgeons throughout the procedure. The primary outcome was Surgical-TLX workload (six domains). Secondary outcomes included operative time, console time, blood loss, Clavien-Dindo complications, length of stay, and pathological findings. RESULTS: Surgical-TLX was assessed in 72 cases by 10 surgeons. Compared with JSES-certified surgeons, junior surgeons had higher mental, temporal, task complexity, and situational awareness workload. In multivariable models, high temporal burden was associated with advanced tumor factors (T ≥ 3 and N-positive disease). Operative and console times were longer for junior surgeons, whereas blood loss, postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 2 or ≥ 3), length of stay, and pathological outcomes were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Under structured supervision, RAS can be implemented safely for junior surgeons despite higher perceived workload. Surgical-TLX may help visualize cognitive burden and inform graded autonomy and supervisory strategies, particularly for advanced tumors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ishiyama et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: