Review highlights diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for uterine mesenchymal neoplasms, aiding clinician decision-making.
The family of uterine mesenchymal neoplasms is diverse in etiology and clinical impact. While histomorphology remains central to diagnostic classification, numerous biomarkers have been developed to aid in refining diagnoses and informing optimal treatment strategies. Indeed, a growing number of neoplasms are being primarily classified on the basis of key pathognomonic genetic events, and this number is expected to continue expanding as access to next-generation sequencing rapidly democratizes. Moreover, several quantitative biomarker tests have been developed to aid in the prognostic stratification of tumours with ambiguous morphologic features, providing critical insights to clinicians seeking optimal oncologic management while minimizing unnecessary treatment morbidity. In this review, we discuss key advances in the utilization of biomarkers for diagnostic classification, prognostication, and the prediction of response to targeted therapeutics in uterine mesenchymal neoplasms, with the aim of highlighting the most clinically impactful biomarkers used by pathologists to enhance the clinical care of patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dedda et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: