Experimental and numerical approaches reveal the impact of interface angles on fracture behavior in composites, indicating implications for safety.
Rock–concrete composites are critical load-bearing elements in geotechnical engineering applications such as slope support. Their mechanical response and damage evolution after fatigue disturbances, such as blasting and mechanical operations, govern the long-term stability and safety of engineered structures. To fully capture these complex behaviors, this study presents a novel multi-scale approach by integrating uniaxial compression tests with three-dimensional digital image correlation and discrete element modeling. This combined experimental–numerical framework is employed to systematically examine the macro- and meso-scale mechanical behavior, crack evolution, and energy response of composites with varying interface angles after quasi-static cyclic loading. The results reveal that as the interface angle increases, the peak strength declines markedly while the brittleness index increases, reflecting a distinct transition in the failure mode from plastic-dissipation-dominated to elastic-energy-storage-dominated. Consequently, the dominant failure mechanism shifts from tensile to shear-slip control. Furthermore, fatigue disturbances exacerbate material degradation, inducing a composite “interface shear–end tension” failure in specimens with higher interface angles and significantly raising the proportion of shear cracks. Energy analysis indicates that cyclic loading enhances the elastic energy storage capacity, and the energy conversion threshold rises continuously with the interface angle. These findings clarify the multi-scale control mechanisms of interface geometry on fatigue-induced failure, providing a theoretical foundation for predicting fatigue life and enabling early pre-warning of failures in rock–concrete engineering structures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: