Systematic review evaluates the effectiveness of biologics in generalized pustular psoriasis, suggesting significant clinical benefits for patients.
Background—Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a rare and severe inflammatory skin disorder—and evidence regarding relative impact of treatments thereof is currently scant. Objective—We aimed to systematically review and narratively synthesize comparative interventional therapies for GPP and secondarily explore their relative effectiveness through exploratory network meta-analyses (NMAs). Methods—Comprehensive searches were performed in PubMed and EMBASE to identify comparative interventional studies that investigated the impact of biologics in GPP. Bayesian NMAs were conducted only for exploratory analyses. Results—Eleven studies met our inclusion criteria and data from 4 of the 11 were used for NMAs. Methodological heterogeneity was evident; the various biologics demonstrated effectiveness in treating GPP. Inhibitors of interleukin (IL)-36 (e.g., spesolimab) resulted in rapid pustular clearance within one week and sustained reductions in flare occurrence. Inhibitors targeting IL-17, IL-23, TNF, and IL-12/23 also demonstrated high response rates, durable disease control, and improvements in quality of life among diverse patient populations. Results from our exploratory NMAs revealed patterns of relative effectiveness with IL-17 and IL-36 inhibitors that are consistent with the existing literature. However, methodological limitations across the four studies deterred us from making conclusive inferences. Conclusions—Biologic therapies provide significant clinical benefit in patients with GPP. Our narrative syntheses highlight the need for future quantitative syntheses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gupta et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: