This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
INTRODUCTION: Pustular psoriasis (PP) is a rare life-threatening skin disease with negatively impact on quality of life (QoL). Clinically, it may be systemic (generalized pustular psoriasis [GPP]) or localized on palms and soles (palmoplantar pustulosis [PPP]). It is not rare to observe plaque psoriasis associated with GPP. OBJECTIVES: We explored the therapies used for PP and their correlation with patient QoL scores, through a cross-sectional study using retrospective data from a monocentric database in the period 2017-2021. METHODS: Patient characteristics were summarized using descriptive statistics and treatment predictors of QoL were identified by multiple regression analysis. Among 108 patients with PP, 57.4% had GPP + PSO whereas 42.6% had PPP. The therapeutic management is based on systemic conventional treatments and biological therapies in both GPP and PPP. RESULTS: GPP + PSO patients with an impaired QoL (DLQI≥10) were associated with biological therapy including certolizumab (odds ratio [OR]=2.38), etanercept (OR=2.25), secukinumab (OR=2.03) or ustekinumab (OR=2.79) whereas, PPP patients were positively associated with secukinumab (OR=2.85) or apremilast (OR 4.28, 95%-CI 0.56-9.62). CONCLUSIONS: Currently, systemic conventional therapy remains the therapeutic fulcrum of PP management. A great effect on QoL, especially for GPP+PSO, was assessed regardless the ongoing treatment and only newer biologic options were able to somehow positively impact.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Buononato et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: