Key result
In patients with chronic CAD or PAD and mild or moderate heart failure, rivaroxaban plus aspirin reduced major adverse cardiovascular events compared with aspirin alone (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.53-0.86).
Why the study?
Patients with chronic CAD or PAD and history of HF are at high risk for MACE, prompting exploration of rivaroxaban with or without aspirin in this population.
Does rivaroxaban with or without aspirin reduce major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with chronic coronary or peripheral artery disease and a history of heart failure?
RCT (n=27,395)
Does rivaroxaban with or without aspirin reduce major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with chronic coronary or peripheral artery disease and a history of heart failure?
Hazard Ratio: 0.68 (95% CI 0.53–0.86)
Absolute Event Rate: 5.5% vs 7.9%
Absolute Risk Reduction: 2.4%
Number Needed to Treat: 42
In patients with chronic CAD or PAD and mild-to-moderate heart failure, adding rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily to aspirin yields a larger absolute reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events compared to patients without heart failure.
Supports adding low-dose rivaroxaban to aspirin in chronic CAD/PAD with mild-moderate HF; extends RCT evidence with larger ARR (NNT=42).
BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic coronary artery disease or peripheral artery disease and history of heart failure (HF) are at high risk for major adverse cardiovascular events. We explored the effects of rivaroxaban with or without aspirin in these patients. METHODS: The COMPASS trial (Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies) randomized 27 395 participants with chronic coronary artery disease or peripheral artery disease to rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily plus aspirin 100 mg daily, rivaroxaban 5 mg twice daily alone, or aspirin 100 mg alone. Patients with New York Heart Association functional class III or IV HF or left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) <30% were excluded. The primary major adverse cardiovascular events outcome comprised cardiovascular death, stroke, or myocardial infarction, and the primary safety outcome was major bleeding using modified International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria. Investigators recorded a history of HF and EF at baseline, if available. We examined the effects of rivaroxaban on major adverse cardiovascular events and major bleeding in patients with or without a history of HF and an EF <40% or ≥40% at baseline. RESULTS: Of the 5902 participants (22%) with a history of HF, 4971 (84%) had EF recorded at baseline, and 12% had EF <40%. Rivaroxaban and aspirin had similar relative reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events compared with aspirin in participants with HF (5.5% versus 7.9%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.68; 95% CI, 0.53-0.86) and those without HF (3.8% versus 4.7%; HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.68-0.93; P for interaction 0.28) but larger absolute risk reduction in those with HF (HF absolute risk reduction 2.4%, number needed to treat=42; no HF absolute risk reduction 1.0%, number needed to treat=103). The primary major adverse cardiovascular events outcome was not statistically different between those with EF <40% (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.55-1.42) and ≥40% (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.67-0.98; P for interaction 0.36). The excess hazard for major bleeding was not different in participants with HF (2.5% versus 1.8%; HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.88-2.09) than in those without HF (3.3% versus 1.9%; HR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.45-2.21; P for interaction 0.26). There were no significant differences in the primary outcomes with rivaroxaban alone. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with chronic coronary artery disease or peripheral artery disease and a history of mild or moderate HF, combination rivaroxaban and aspirin compared with aspirin alone produces similar relative but larger absolute benefits than in those without HF. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01776424.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Branch et al. (2019) conducted an RCT in Chronic coronary artery disease or peripheral artery disease (n=27,395). Rivaroxaban plus aspirin vs. Aspirin 100 mg alone was evaluated on Cardiovascular death, stroke, or myocardial infarction (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.53-0.86). In patients with chronic CAD or PAD and mild or moderate heart failure, rivaroxaban plus aspirin reduced major adverse cardiovascular events compared with aspirin alone (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.53-0.86).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: