Randomized trial shows increased heart rate and prolonged JTc in association with air pollution exposure, indicating vulnerability.
Altered cardiac electrophysiological activity may represent an important mechanism linking long-term air pollution exposure to cardiovascular disease. However, evidence on chronic exposure effects on specific ECG parameters, particularly the heart rate–corrected JT (JTc) interval as a sensitive marker of ventricular repolarization, remains limited. We investigated associations between long-term exposure to ambient air pollutants and ECG parameters of cardiac conduction and repolarization, with emphasis on sex-specific effects. We analyzed 9181 repeated 12-lead ECGs from 4143 participants in the population-based KORA S4, F4 and FF4 studies. Annual average residential exposures to nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ), particulate matter ≤2.5 μm (PM 2.5 ), and particle number concentration (PNC; ultrafine particles ≤100 nm) were estimated using land-use regression models. Associations were assessed using generalized additive mixed models with sex interactions. Effect modification by obesity, smoking, and education was examined in sex-stratified analyses. In men, an interquartile range (IQR) increase in PNC was associated with a 0.49% (95% CI: 0.07, 0.91) higher heart rate (HR), while IQR increases in PM 2.5 and NO 2 were associated with 0.31% (95% CI: 0.10, 0.51) and 0.51% (95% CI: 0.28, 0.74) prolongations of JTc, respectively. In women, main-model estimates were less consistent; stratified analyses suggested stronger positive associations in subgroups defined by obesity, smoking history, and lower educational attainment, with the strongest effects among women with multiple susceptibility characteristics. Long-term air pollution exposure was associated with increased heart rate and prolonged JTc, supporting a role of chronic air pollution in subclinical electrophysiological changes and motivating further work to confirm vulnerable phenotypes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: