Cross-sectional study assesses radiation safety compliance among operating room staff, highlighting a need for enhanced training.
The aim of this study was to assess the level of compliance of operating room personnel with radiation protection and safety measures against ionizing radiation. A cross-sectional study was conducted among operating room staff in three Moroccan hospitals equipped with a fluoroscopy system. Data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire addressing practices, knowledge, and attitudes related to radiation protection. Among participants, 78% considered wearing a personal dosimeter during image-guided procedures as necessary, yet only 16% reported actually using one. None of the respondents indicated receiving monthly or annual dosimetric reports. Regarding protective measures, 45% used only a lead apron, 25% relied on distance as a means of protection, and only 6% used both a lead apron and a thyroid shield. Concerning knowledge, 75% were unaware that distance is the most effective means of reducing exposure to ionizing radiation; 33% considered the lead apron as the main protective tool, while 42% had no idea. Finally, only 22% of respondents were familiar with the three fundamental principles of radiation protection (justification, optimization, limitation), and 17% mentioned two of them, mainly justification and optimization. This study highlights a low level of adherence to radiation protection measures among operating room staff, reflecting a lack of awareness and training. Strengthening education programs and standardizing protective practices are essential to enhance occupational safety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Housni et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: