Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
June 14, 2026PhilosophiaOpen Access

It is Not Just a Matter of Taste – it Makes Me Angry!

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

JEJohn Eriksson

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Argument develops Eriksson’s view on moral and taste judgments, addressing counterarguments by Pietroiusti.

Key Points

  • The paper aims to defend Eriksson's view that moral judgments are more complex than taste judgments.
  • Reviews the arguments for and against moral expressivism.
  • Analyzes Eriksson's and Pietroiusti's positions on moral and taste disagreements.
  • Explores the implications of attitudinal states in moral and taste judgments.
  • Supports Eriksson’s claim that moral disagreements are not faultless unlike taste disagreements.
  • Argues against Pietroiusti’s rebuttal, reinforcing the complexity of moral judgments.

Cite This Study

John Eriksson (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2e4687b1cc60ccdea8b4bchttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-026-01011-2
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Expressivists Beware—Moral Judgments Do Not Aim at a Deflationary Truth2025
  2. 2Knowing What One Likes: Epistemicist Solution to Faultless Disagreement2024
  3. 3Expressivism and moral argumentation2024
  4. 4Judgments of taste as strategic moves in a coordination game2024
  5. 5Taste(s) and Common Sense(s)2024