Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Review demonstrates the importance of integrating local knowledge for improving student engagement and inclusion in classrooms.
Education systems often privilege dominant forms of language, culture, and knowledge while marginalizing the lived experiences of rural, indigenous, tribal, lower-caste, and economically marginalized communities. Drawing on Bourdieu’s theory of cultural capital, this review re-examines how schools reproduce inequality by rewarding students who possess the language styles, dispositions, and knowledge valued by dominant social groups. When students’ local dialects, community practices, and experiential knowledge are ignored, they experience not only academic challenges but also identity-based marginalization and epistemic injustice. Such exclusion affects classroom participation, confidence, and aspirations Grounded in socio-cultural theory, particularly Vygotsky’s view of learning as a socially mediated process, this article highlights the importance of connecting classroom instruction to students’ cultural realities. The concept of funds of knowledge demonstrates that communities possess rich intellectual resources developed through everyday life. Empirical studies reviewed in this paper show that integrating indigenous and community knowledge into subject teaching—such as chemistry, mathematics, and secondary curricula—improves student engagement, conceptual understanding, participation, self-concept, and resilience. Research further indicates that when students’ cultural backgrounds are respected, they feel valued and form stronger connections between academic content and real-life experiences. Despite growing evidence supporting epistemic inclusion, challenges remain, including standardized curricula, examination systems that prioritize abstract knowledge, and limited teacher preparation in culturally responsive pedagogy. The review concludes that educational inequality is not only about access but also about whose knowledge is recognized as legitimate. Recognizing community knowledge as educational capital is essential for promoting inclusion, participation, identity affirmation, and epistemic justice within classroom knowledge construction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sundas et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: