Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mixed-methods study identifies factors affecting advocacy service quality and offers recommendations for improvement.
The study aimed to determine the current situation and factors affecting the quality of advocacy services in primary school social work in Vietnam. A mixed-methods approach was utilized, integrating 398 quantitative surveys with 45 in-depth interviews to triangulate findings from teachers, social workers, and administrators. The research model includes five independent factors (Trust, Responsiveness, Service Performance Capacity, Empathy, Implementation Conditions), one mediating variable (Faith), one dependent variable (Satisfaction) and one moderating variable (Perception). The SEM analysis results showed that the above factors explained 44.9 % of the variation in Trust and 31.9 % of Satisfaction. Of which, “Trust” and “Empathy” have the strongest impact on “Faith”, while “Faith” strongly affects “Satisfaction” ( β = 0.539, f 2 = 0.411). On the contrary, “Service Perception” has a weak impact and does not play a clear moderating role. The research results contribute to affirming the mediating role of trust in improving the quality of advocacy services, and at the same time provide practical recommendations in developing this service and building a comprehensive student support environment in primary schools.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hoang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: