Analysis reveals the need for inclusivity in AI design to prevent epistemic loss among marginalized artists.
Hintze et al.'s recent study highlights the tendency of current-generation vision-language models to converge on overly generic outputs. We argue that considering AI imageries as epistemic artefact and AI-driven artistic practices as socio-cultural processes can provide better understandings around the implications of such conditions beyond merely technical aspects of image generation. Drawing from our ongoing research, we highlight the necessity of bringing the epistemic vulnerability of marginalized artists and users and their hierarchical relations with these tools into sociotechnical design conversations, and by doing so, to explore the possibility for pluriversal and just AI futures, particularly in the Global South.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Safir et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: