Key result
Respiratory viral codetection does not worsen hospitalization rates or illness duration versus RSV monoinfection.
Why the study?
Young children with RSV often have viral coinfections, but the impact of respiratory viral codetections on RSV disease burden and variation by specific viruses remained unclear.
Does viral codetection increase disease burden compared to RSV monoinfection in children < 5 years?
Observational (n=585)
Does viral codetection increase disease burden compared to RSV monoinfection in children < 5 years?
Absolute Event Rate: 7% vs 8%
Viral codetections in young children with RSV do not significantly increase healthcare resource utilization, symptomatology, or parental work absence compared to RSV monoinfection.
RSV codetection was associated with similar hospitalization rates; leaves open whether multiplex testing changes management in young children.
BACKGROUND: Young children with respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) often have viral coinfections. This study assessed the impact of respiratory viral codetections on RSV disease burden in children < 5 years and whether this varies by specific codetected viruses. METHODS: Retrospective analyses were performed using data from the RSV ComNet study prior to implementation of passive immunisation. Children < 5 years with acute respiratory infection (ARI) were eligible for testing for RSV and other viruses (multiplex real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction). Primary care physicians completed a short report on day 1, and parents completed follow-up questionnaires (digital or by phone) on days 14 and 30. Disease burden was measured by healthcare resource utilisation, clinical course, and parental work absence. RESULTS: Of the 2637 children tested, 822 (31%) were RSV-positive, of which 585 (52%) had completed day 1 data. There were 378 (65%) children with RSV monoinfection and 207 (35%) with RSV codetection. Rhinovirus/enterovirus was most frequently codetected (60%). Healthcare resource utilisation, clinical course, and parental work absence did not significantly differ between children with RSV codetection and RSV monoinfection. Hospitalisation rate was 7% (CI: 5%-10%) versus 8% (CI: 5%-13%) and mean duration of illness 11 (CI: 10.6-11.9) versus 12 days (CI: 11.4-13.4), respectively. CONCLUSION: RSV-infections with viral codetections were generally not associated with increased healthcare resource utilisation, symptomatology, or parental work absence in children in primary care, suggesting that viral codetection alongside RSV disease does not impose a greater burden on patients or society. Further research is needed to determine whether specific RSV codetected viruses differentially impact disease burden.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Duijst et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection (n=585). Respiratory viral codetection vs. RSV monoinfection was evaluated on Hospitalisation rate. Respiratory viral codetection in young children with RSV did not significantly increase hospitalisation rates (7% vs 8%) or mean duration of illness (11 vs 12 days) compared to RSV monoinfection.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: