We only have this paper's title and publication details.
Read it at the sourceCaptured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“The flurry of conflicting data published following the 2008 Expert Consensus Document left many practitioners confused. However, much of the published data used results of platelet function tests as surrogate markers of cardiovascular risk. The differences in drug levels and in platelet function studies caused concern about an adverse drug interaction, but the clinical significance of these laboratory test results has not been substantiated when held to the higher scientific standard of large patient studies with clinically relevant endpoints, such as heart attacks or strokes.”
“In patients at high risk of GI bleeding who require antiplatelet therapy for heart disease, the balance of risk and benefit favor use of proton-pump inhibitors. In patients at low risk of GI bleeding, however, the balance of risk and benefit tips away from using proton-pump inhibitors together with antiplatelet drugs.”
“Further research is needed to define the optimal strategy to reduce GI events in patients on antithrombotic therapy, though prophylactic PPI use seems promising.”
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bhatt et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: