Key result
Perceived frailty (10.6%) and objective frailty (5.0%) in AF patients showed minimal overlap (<1%), but both were associated with non-recommended anticoagulant dosages.
Why the study?
Definitions of frailty in AF vary and may not overlap with physicians' perceptions, which can impact therapies and outcomes.
How does perceived versus objective frailty impact anticoagulant dosing in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Population
13 621 patients with non-valvular AF in ETNA-AF-Europe with baseline frailty data
Comparison
Subjective investigator judgement of frailty vs objective Modified Frailty Index
Design
Prospective, multi-centre, post-authorization, observational study sub-analysis
Authors
Loading...
Both perceived and objective frailty associate with non-recommended dosing despite minimal overlap; leaves open whether standardized tools improve AF anticoagulation accuracy.
Observational (n=13,621)
Yes
How does perceived versus objective frailty impact anticoagulant dosing in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Absolute Event Rate: 10.6% vs 5%
Physicians' subjective perception of frailty in AF patients differs significantly from objective assessment, but both are associated with inappropriate anticoagulant dosing.
Diemberger et al. (2022) conducted an observational in atrial fibrillation (n=13,621). Perceived frailty vs. Objective frailty was evaluated on Prevalence of frailty. Perceived frailty (10.6%) and objective frailty (5.0%) in AF patients showed minimal overlap (<1%), but both were associated with non-recommended anticoagulant dosages.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: