Analysis reveals how documentary cinema used sensory stimulation to navigate political pressures in Maoist China.
During the Great Leap Forward (1958–1960), Chinese cinema found itself trapped between heightened political pressures and a fervent pursuit of shortened production cycles, using exaggerated numerical information within its cinematographic language to represent extreme labor intensity and the dreamlike speed of historical development. Bridging sensory history and media discourse analysis, this study examines the “artistic documentary”(yishu xing jilupian), a hybrid genre weaponized to navigate this crisis. Through two foundational case studies, The Caprice of the Ming Tombs Reservoir (Shisanling Shuiku Changxiangqu, 1958) and Huang Baomei (1958), this article argues that cinema weaponized sensory stimulation to achieve the following functions: manufacturing political identification and mass subjectivity; simulating utopian futures to compel popular endurance of present bodily exhaustion and material scarcity; juxtaposing individual heroism with collective narratives to facilitate ideological integration, a synthesis that ultimately fractured as model workers were physically detached from the labor process; and projecting a socialist teleology wherein hyper-acceleration would paradoxically deliver human emancipation, an end to bodily alienation, and a “decelerated” future capable of mastering time itself.”
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: