COMMENTARY ON Ethics and Accounting Research: The Issue of Deception.

Jack L. Krogstad

doi:10.2308/bria-7709405

March 2, 1996Behavioral Research in Accounting

COMMENTARY ON Ethics and Accounting Research: The Issue of Deception.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

This commentary discusses the ethical implications of using deception in accounting research, examining both its merits and limitations.
Analysis of ethical considerations surrounding deception in accounting studies.
Discussion of the roles of power, status, and wealth in ethical reasoning.
Review of literature on ethics in accounting research.
Identified key ethical issues connected with deception in experimental accounting research.
Highlighted the importance of ethical reasoning in research involving power dynamics.
Critiqued the merits and limitations of deception as a valid research tool.

Implication

Commentary highlights ethical concerns regarding deception in accounting research, suggesting a need for deeper ethical reasoning.

Abstract

Comments on the article 'Ethics and Accounting Research: The Issue of Deception,' by Karen L. Hooks and Joseph J. Schultz Jr., published in the March 1996 supplement to the journal 'Behavioral Research in Accounting.' Merits and limitations of deception in accounting research; Ethical issues involved in using deception in experimental work; Role of ethical reasoning in situations involving power, status or wealth.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Jack L. Krogstad (1996) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2f9782a1cfeec490828857 https://doi.org/10.2308/bria-7709405

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

COMMENTARY ON Ethics and Accounting Research: The Issue of Deception.

Key Points

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

COMMENTARY ON Ethics and Accounting Research: The Issue of Deception.

Key Points

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading