Another Perspective on the Use of Deception in Auditing Experiments.

Nicholas Dopuch

doi:10.2308/ajpt-9703122177

September 1, 1992Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory

Another Perspective on the Use of Deception in Auditing Experiments.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

The aim is to explore the use of deception in auditing experiments and its implications for behavioral research.
Analyzed challenges in engaging subjects in experimental tasks due to lack of incentives.
Assessed the impact of market forces on experimental designs in auditing.
Discussed potential legitimate incentives for auditing studies.
Identified a gap in the current experimental designs that fail to effectively engage participants.
Suggested that incorporating market forces could enhance the legitimacy and effectiveness of incentives.

Implication

Discussion reveals challenges in using deception for behavioral research in auditing, suggesting improvements in incentives.

Abstract

Discusses the possibility of using deception for behavioral research in auditing and accounting. Lack of incentives for subjects to engage in experimental tasks; Failure to incorporate market forces in experimental designs; Problem in finding more legitimate kinds of incentives to incorporate in auditing studies.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Nicholas Dopuch (1992) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2f982ba1cfeec490829261 https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-9703122177

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Another Perspective on the Use of Deception in Auditing Experiments.

Key Points

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Another Perspective on the Use of Deception in Auditing Experiments.

Key Points

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading