Review identifies gaps in BBB-crossing medications for Alzheimer's disease, suggesting integrated workflows for improved predictions.
Despite significant investment in drug discovery, Alzheimer's disease (AD) continues to be a significant unmet medical need. The effectiveness of CNS drugs is severely hampered by the blood-brain barrier (BBB), and many potential compounds fall short because of poor ADMET characteristics or insufficient brain exposure. Key research gaps on BBB-crossing compounds for AD are identified in this review: A strong dependence on in vitro or in silico predictors that do not generalize well in vivo; A limited integration of robust BBB permeability prediction with ADMET profiling, A translational gap between computational predictions and experimental/clinical validation; inadequate multi-target and mechanism-aware evaluation in repurposing studies. We point out antipsychotic repurposing candidates (like benperidol) as examples that lack thorough BBB/ADMET and free-energy or dynamics studies but have encouraging docking or preclinical signals. In order to identify candidates with genuine translational potential, we suggest a useful, integrated workflow that combines multi-task machine-learning BBB models, orthogonal in-vitro assays, ADMET pipelines, and conventional MD/MM-PBSA benchmarking. Closing these gaps will improve the success rate of AD treatments by speeding up the selection of agents with both target engagement and consistent brain exposure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Himanshu Jangir2* Ankita Thakur1 (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: