What question did this study set out to answer?

The aim is to clarify and critique Jurjako's positions in naturalistic meta-ethics, particularly regarding normative reasons.

June 15, 2026Open Access

Naturalism, Normativity, and Reasons

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

Analytical commentary critiques Jurjako's naturalistic meta-ethics and its implications for normative reasons.

The aim is to clarify and critique Jurjako's positions in naturalistic meta-ethics, particularly regarding normative reasons.
Analyzed Jurjako's arguments from his monograph, highlighting key positions and challenges.
Engaged with criticisms related to idealization challenges and evolutionary debunking arguments.
Explored implications for the broader landscape of meta-ethical debates.
Identified ambiguities in Jurjako's endorsement of naturalism in meta-ethics.
Highlighted challenges posed by Enoch’s idealization challenge and Street’s arguments.
Concluded that Jurjako's approach remains a significant, albeit flawed, contender in meta-ethical discussions.

Attila Tanyi (2026) studied this question.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark