Key result
Platelet-based diagnostic indices show potential for chronic liver disease monitoring but face major confounding interferences.
Why the study?
Laboratory and clinical interferences complicate the utility of platelet-based diagnostic indices in longitudinal monitoring and prognostication of patients with chronic liver disease.
This review highlights the complexities and potential utility of novel platelet-based indices for monitoring and prognosticating patients with chronic liver disease.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Platelet indices should not yet guide CLD management; leaves open their utility pending validation amid confounders.
A multitude of laboratory and clinical interferences influence the utility of platelet-based diagnostic indices, including immature platelet fraction, in longitudinal monitoring and prognostication of patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). The complex yet highly regulated molecular basis of platelet production and clearance kinetics becomes dysregulated in liver pathogenesis. These underlying molecular mechanisms, including premature platelet clearance and bone marrow suppression in parallel with the progressive (e.g., treatment-naïve) or regressive (e.g., on-treatment and off-treatment) disease courses, involved in CLDs, may further confound the changes in platelet-liver correlations over time. Platelet count and function are commonly and secondarily altered in vivo in CLDs. However, the precise characterization of platelet functions during cirrhosis, including in vitro platelet aggregation, has proven challenging due to interferences such as thrombocytopenia. A flow cytometric approach may help monitor the unstably rebalanced hyper- and hypoaggregable states in patients with cirrhosis at risk of hyperaggregable, prothrombotic, or bleeding events. Studies have attempted to stratify patients with cirrhosis by substages and prognosis through the use of novel indices such as the ratio of in vitro endogenous platelet aggregation to platelet count. This review attempts to highlight clinical and laboratory precautions in the context of platelet-assisted CLD monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2022) conducted a review in Chronic liver disease. Platelet-based diagnostic indices was evaluated. Platelet-based diagnostic indices offer potential for monitoring chronic liver disease kinetics, but their clinical utility is heavily confounded by complex laboratory and physiological interferences.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: