Key result
Radiofrequency renal denervation lowers 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP by ~5 mm Hg vs sham at 36 months.
Why the study?
To evaluate the 3-year durability of blood pressure reductions, antihypertensive medication use, and safety following radiofrequency renal denervation in patients with uncontrolled hypertension on antihypertensive medications.
Does radiofrequency renal denervation safely provide durable blood pressure reduction compared with a sham procedure in patients with uncontrolled hypertension on standard medical therapy over 3 years?
RCT (n=337)
Blinded (until 6 months)
1:1 initially, then 2:1
Yes
Does radiofrequency renal denervation safely provide durable blood pressure reduction compared with a sham procedure in patients with uncontrolled hypertension on standard medical therapy over 3 years?
Mean Difference: -4.7 (95% CI -7.7–-1.6)
Absolute Event Rate: -14% vs -9.3%
p-value: p=0.0028
Radiofrequency renal denervation provides a safe, significant, and durable reduction in blood pressure over 3 years compared to a sham control in patients with uncontrolled hypertension on medical therapy.
Supports radiofrequency renal denervation for durable BP control on stable medications; extends prior RCT findings to 36-month follow-up.
Background The SPYRAL HTN‐ON MED (Global Clinical Study of Renal Denervation With the Symplicity Spyral Multielectrode Renal Denervation System in Patients With Uncontrolled Hypertension on Standard Medical Therapy) trial showed that radiofrequency renal denervation (RDN) using the Symplicity Spyral catheter yielded significant blood pressure (BP) reductions at 6 and 24 months compared with sham control in patients with hypertension on antihypertensive medications. In this prespecified analysis through the final follow‐up, we evaluate the durability of BP reductions, antihypertensive medication use, and safety through 3 years. Methods SPYRAL HTN‐ON MED is a global, randomized, sham‐controlled trial enrolling patients with uncontrolled hypertension. Patients were prescribed 1 to 3 antihypertensive medications and randomized to RDN or a sham procedure. After 6 months, patients were unblinded, and sham patients could cross over to RDN. Crossover patients' values for BP and antihypertensive medications were imputed to 36 months using their last observation before crossover to RDN carried forward. Statistical analyses, including imputation, were exploratory and conducted on the intention‐to‐treat population. Results After 6 months, 74% of sham patients crossed over to undergo RDN. Patients undergoing RDN had statistically significant 24‐hour ambulatory systolic BP reductions (treatment difference, –4.7 mm Hg; P =0.0028) and office systolic BP reductions (difference, –7.5 mm Hg; P =0.0002) compared with the sham control group through 36 months. At 36 months, the antihypertensive medication burden was balanced between groups (RDN, 5.2±5.0 versus 5.5±9.9; P =0.63). Crossover patients had significantly better office BP control after RDN. Clinical adverse events were rare. Conclusions Compared with sham patients through 3 years, patients undergoing RDN had significantly greater 24‐hour ambulatory and office BP reductions, with a similar medication burden. RDN maintained a durable safety profile through 3 years. REGISTRATION URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study ; Unique identifier: NCT02439775.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kandzari et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Uncontrolled hypertension (n=337). Radiofrequency renal denervation (Symplicity Spyral catheter) vs. Sham control procedure (renal angiogram) was evaluated on Change in 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure at 36 months (MD -4.7 mm Hg, 95% CI -7.7 to -1.6, p=0.0028). Radiofrequency renal denervation significantly reduced 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP by a mean difference of 4.7 mm Hg compared to sham control at 36 months, with a similar medication burden.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: