Key result
PET-derived RV strain strongly correlates with MR for global longitudinal strain.
Why the study?
Evaluating the right ventricle with PET remains challenging, prompting evaluation of the feasibility of RV strain quantification using a newly developed PET feature tracking technique.
Does PET-derived feature tracking accurately quantify right ventricular strain compared to magnetic resonance imaging?
Observational (n=123)
Does PET-derived feature tracking accurately quantify right ventricular strain compared to magnetic resonance imaging?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PET-derived feature tracking is a feasible tool for quantifying right ventricular strain, demonstrating strong correlation with the magnetic resonance reference standard.
UNLABELLED: Positron emission tomography (PET) provides robust assessment of cardiac function, whereas evaluation of the right ventricle (RV) remains challenging. Myocardial strain analysis has emerged as a sensitive marker for subtle wall dysfunction. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of RV strain quantification using a newly developed PET feature tracking technique, with magnetic resonance (MR) strain as the reference standard. RESULTS: Mean GLS and GCS were -24.1±6.9% vs. -23.4±5.6% and -16.2±5.4% vs. -16.6±4.2% for PET and CMR, respectively. Both parameters showed strong correlations between the two modalities (r=0.77 and 0.74 for GLS and GCS, respectively; p<0.0001). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated acceptable agreement, despite the presence of significant proportional bias (GLS: bias 0.1±4.4% [limits of agreement (LOA) -8.6 to 8.8], r=0.2, and p=0.01; GCS: bias -0.7±3.6% [LOA -7.8 to 6.4], r=-0.4, and p<0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSION: PET derived RV wall strain analysis demonstrated a significant correlation with MR strain. PET feature tracking has the potential as a useful tool to detect RV wall dysfunction in routine clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Katahira et al. (2026) reported an observational. PET-derived feature tracking vs. Magnetic resonance (MR) strain was evaluated on Global longitudinal strain (GLS) correlation (r=0.77, p=<0.0001). PET-derived right ventricular strain analysis demonstrated strong correlation with magnetic resonance strain for global longitudinal strain (r=0.77, p<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: