Key result
Automated carotid segmentation matches manual contouring with substantial agreement in >85% of cases.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: To develop and validate an automated segmentation technique for the detection of the lumen and outer wall boundaries in MR vessel wall studies of the common carotid artery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A new segmentation method was developed using a three-dimensional (3D) deformable vessel model requiring only one single user interaction by combining 3D MR angiography (MRA) and 2D vessel wall images. This vessel model is a 3D cylindrical Non-Uniform Rational B-Spline (NURBS) surface which can be deformed to fit the underlying image data. Image data of 45 subjects was used to validate the method by comparing manual and automatic segmentations. Vessel wall thickness and volume measurements obtained by both methods were compared. RESULTS: Substantial agreement was observed between manual and automatic segmentation; over 85% of the vessel wall contours were segmented successfully. The interclass correlation was 0.690 for the vessel wall thickness and 0.793 for the vessel wall volume. Compared with manual image analysis, the automated method demonstrated improved interobserver agreement and inter-scan reproducibility. Additionally, the proposed automated image analysis approach was substantially faster. CONCLUSION: This new automated method can reduce analysis time and enhance reproducibility of the quantification of vessel wall dimensions in clinical studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Klooster et al. (2011) studied Carotid artery vessel wall imaging (n=45). Automated segmentation technique using a 3D deformable vessel model vs. Manual segmentation was evaluated on Vessel wall thickness and volume measurements (ICC 0.690 for thickness, 0.793 for volume). An automated segmentation technique for the carotid artery successfully segmented >85% of contours and demonstrated substantial agreement with manual segmentation for vessel wall thickness (ICC 0.690).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: