Quasi-experimental study compares course completion in traditional versus hybrid models, suggesting new success metrics.
Introduction: This article discusses results emanating from a study examining the validity of current measures of academic success in higher education. Methods: The study uses a quasi-experimental quantitative design to compare outcomes of traditional online College Algebra courses and the same course using a hybrid competency-focused model with a polyparadigm delivery approach. Results: Preliminary findings showed differences in the proportions of successful course completions based on how “success” was interpreted. Discussion: These findings imply that conventional performance-based metrics may not adequately represent authentic learning or student academic growth. Limitations: Limitations include substantial differences in sample sizes being compared and confounding variables related to the course delivery design and implementation, even the actual metrics being measured. Conclusions: A broader reconceptualization of academic success is necessary, balancing quantitative and qualitative measures to capture the complexity of learning in digital learning environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pascal Roubides (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: