Review synthesizes governance challenges of AI and data in smart cities, highlighting implications for sustainability.
Artificial intelligence has become constitutive of smart city governance, yet data and algorithmic challenges remain analytically separated in existing scholarship, obscuring their recursive coupling and consequences for the built environment. This review synthesises 82 peer-reviewed studies (2020–2025) drawn from a deduplicated corpus of 876 records, combining PRISMA-guided methodology with VOSviewer and CiteSpace bibliometric mapping. Annual output rose from 78 publications in 2020 to 224 in 2024, with ten leading countries contributing roughly 84% of the corpus. The keyword network organises into five thematic clusters spanning AI technical foundations, data governance, algorithmic governance, sustainability, and built-environment governance; emerging 2023–2025 couplings between digital twin and SDG 11, and between generative AI and SDG 11, mark a shifting research frontier, while the algorithmic governance → SDG 16 linkage constitutes the strongest single ribbon in the synthesis. The study advances a double-helix coupling mechanism specifying directional propagation, reverse modulation, and structural cross-linking between data and algorithmic strands, reframing building energy management, digital-twin operation, and smart infrastructure as governance arrangements whose sustainability legitimacy depends on the simultaneous integrity of both strands.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: