Demonstrates the potential for green hydrogen production in Malaysia using seawater electrolysis, highlighting its implications for energy transition.
Malaysia showcases their commitment to serve as a regional green hydrogen hub from the National Energy Transition Roadmap (NETR) with a target of 2.5 million tonnes produced annually by 2050. The obstacle to this grand mission is the dependent of the green hydrogen production; electrolysis on freshwater, challenging the practicality for industrial scale. This paper explores the potential of leveraging Malaysia's Blue Ocean Economy cuing at seawater as a resourceful alternative to freshwater. The primary technical hurdle, however, is the corrosive chloride content of seawater, which impairs the electrolysers and this article points at two available solutions: i. Indirect Seawater Electrolysis (ISE) and ii. Direct Seawater Electrolysis (DSE). By a systematic comparative technology assessment, various criteria of performance are weighed, including technology readiness and costs. Essential analysis implies that a dual-track strategy is ideal for Malaysia with ISE being the most viable for immediate implementation factored by the high technology readiness (TRL 8-9), minimal impact on hydrogen cost (increasing LCOH by <1%), and added benefit of producing potable water to enhance national water security. On the other hand, DSE, is a decisive strategic investment for the future despite its current lower maturity (TRL 3-5). Recent breakthroughs in anion exchange membranes (AEM) with stabilities of more than 9000 h point to bright prospects for their use in offshore and decentralized H 2 production. Consequently, Malaysia should concurrently deploy ISE for immediate gains and pursue intensive R&D in DSE to take the leading role in the future green hydrogen landscape.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kasri et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: