Narrative review explores theranostic strategies improving iodine uptake in radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer, indicating new treatment pathways.
Background: Radioiodine (Na[131I]I) therapy is the cornerstone of systemic treatment for differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), exploiting sodium–iodide symporter (NIS) expression for durable control. Up to 30–40% of advanced cases develop radioiodine-refractory disease (RAI-R DTC), marked by impaired iodine uptake, aggressive behavior, and poor response to Na[131I]I. Locoregional treatments, multikinase inhibitors (MKIs), and selective targeted agents improve progression-free survival but are not curative and carry cumulative toxicity, motivating precision-based alternatives. The primary objective of this review is to clarify the evolving theranostic paradigm in RAI-R DTC; the secondary objectives are to appraise redifferentiation and iodine-based theranostics for restoring or exploiting iodine avidity and to evaluate non-iodine theranostic strategies for cases where iodine biology is absent, impaired, or unreliable. Methods: This narrative review synthesizes contemporary evidence on theranostic strategies in RAI-R DTC, drawn from available studies, clinical trials, and current guidelines, with an emphasis on redifferentiation and non-iodine approaches; a systematic search protocol was not applied. Results: Theranostics couples target-specific molecular imaging with matched radionuclide therapy and response-adapted sequencing. Its most transformative application is redifferentiation, in which pharmacologic modulation of oncogenic signaling can restore iodine avidity and enable renewed, dosimetry-guided Na[131I]I treatment. Beyond iodine, somatostatin receptor (SSTR) imaging and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) have re-emerged in very selected cases, whereas alpha emitters remain investigational. Refractoriness is increasingly viewed as a reversible continuum rather than a fixed state. Conclusions: Theranostics can individualize RAI-R DTC treatment, restoring or exploiting iodine biology where possible and shifting to non-iodine targets where it is unreliable. Patient selection, timing, and integration with systemic therapy are central, and prospective validation is needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ovčariček et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: