Comparative study shows hybrid predictive framework enhances attack detection accuracy and reduces false negatives.
Escalating cyber threats demand predictive mechanisms capable of anticipating attacks before they materialize. Conventional machine learning (ML) approaches — including decision trees, support vector machines, and random forests — have provided a foundation for anomaly detection and attack classification but exhibit critical weaknesses when confronted with dynamic adversarial strategies, imbalanced data distributions, and previously unseen zero-day exploits. This paper investigates the evolutionary transition from traditional ML to Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen AI), encompassing Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), Variational Autoencoders (VAEs), and Large Language Models (LLMs). A hybrid predictive framework is proposed that integrates the statistical robustness of classical ML with the simulation capacity of Gen AI. The architecture spans layered modules for data acquisition, preprocessing, ML-based anomaly detection, adversarial simulation, predictive analytics, and real-time dashboard visualization. Experimental assessment on the NSL-KDD benchmark reveals that the hybrid approach achieves 96.4% detection accuracy, reduces false-negative rates on rare attack classes from 18.3% to 4.7%, and enables proactive zero-day threat anticipation — capabilities that exceed standalone ML by a significant margin. Ethical governance, computational considerations, and explainability requirements are systematically addressed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kumar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: