Autonomous cybersecurity requires a transition from isolated alert classification toward coordinated threat investigation, evidence-grounded decisions, and measurable containment. This study integrates a generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) multi-agent threat-hunting architecture with a six-state nonlinear model of secure, exposed, compromised, and recovered assets and the evolving hunting and response capabilities. The framework employs independent evidence verification and policy-controlled response authorization, while model analysis uses a containment threshold, equilibrium stability and parameter sensitivity. Across the three configurations reported in the supplied results, compromise fractions were 42.71% for rule-based defence, 32.48% for machine-learning-supported defence, and 19.16% for GenAI-enabled defence; corresponding containment thresholds were 6.860, 4.857, and 3.275. These submitted outcomes indicate a 55.1% lower modelled compromise fraction for the GenAI configuration than for rule-based defence, although all thresholds remain above unity and therefore do not establish threat elimination. Three author-supplied three-dimensional response surfaces describe the effects of propagation, assisted recovery, adversarial adaptation and hunting activation. The investigation distinguishes these reported model-based outcomes from unreported alert-level accuracy benchmarks and from numerical bifurcations that require recorded AUTO-07p continuation diagnostics. The resulting contribution is a coherent framework linking generative investigation, bounded response capacity and nonlinear cybersecurity resilience, with explicit requirements for reproducible experimental validation and safe operational deployment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ajibola et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: