Demonstrates fracture growth patterns in hard-rock reservoirs using a numerical simulation model, indicating favorable steering angles for enhanced recovery.
Horizontal-well steering fracturing is an important completion strategy for unconventional reservoirs, where fracture growth is jointly controlled by wellbore azimuth, natural fractures, and inter-cluster stress interference. In this study, a two-dimensional fluid-solid-coupled hydraulic-fracturing model with embedded cohesive elements was developed to simulate fracture initiation and growth at steering angles of 0°, 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90°. The Blanton, Warpinski-Teufel, and Blanton-Gao hydraulic-fracture/natural-fracture interaction criteria were used as mechanical benchmarks to interpret simulated capture, deflection, and penetration regimes. The simulations indicate that natural fractures preferentially guide fracture propagation: hydraulic fractures tend to be captured by, or propagate along, natural fractures at approach angles ≤30°, whereas penetration is more likely at approach angles ≥60°. In the single-stage single-cluster model, the 90° case produces the largest simulated fracture length and the highest failed-cohesive-element count. In the single-stage multi-cluster model with 3 m cluster spacing, the 30–45° interval shows more favorable fracture extension and interface activation than the 90° case because inter-cluster stress-shadow effects suppress fracture-network development at large steering angles. The resulting steering-angle window should be interpreted as a comparative result for the fixed mesh, deterministic natural-fracture realization, and baseline cluster-spacing configuration adopted here. These results provide a mechanistic basis for steering-fracturing design in hard-rock reservoirs while clarifying the applicability limits of the two-dimensional plane-strain approximation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: