Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Prospective trial assesses workflow efficiency in 300 surgeries using a robotic imaging system, suggesting clinical benefits.
BACKGROUND: Intraoperative C-arm imaging is essential in orthopaedic and trauma surgery, particularly with the increasing use of minimally invasive techniques. Conventional repositioning is performed by non-scrubbed staff, while robotic imaging systems are mainly limited to hybrid operating rooms. This study presents the first clinical experience with a fully motorised, self-driving mobile 3D-C-arm. METHODS: In this prospective, single-center study, 300 procedures were analyzed using device log data and perioperative parameters to assess imaging workflow and system performance. RESULTS: Of 300 procedures, 279 were included. Mean procedure time was 104.7 ± 57.4 min, with a C-arm operation time of 31.9 ± 29.1 min, corresponding to a C-arm operation ratio (COR) of 35.2%. Automated positioning accounted for 30.7% of movements, and 37.9% of images were acquired from stored positions. CONCLUSION: The system enabled sterile-field control and demonstrated potential to support intraoperative imaging workflow. Further comparative studies are required to evaluate its clinical impact.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bullert et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: