Randomized trial evaluates reliability of MEMS gyroscopes, indicating a balanced assessment approach.
As the core sensor of inertial measurement units, the reliability of Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) gyroscopes is critical for long-term navigation and motion control applications. To bridge the mechanism-data gap in MEMS multi-mechanism degradation modeling, this paper proposes a physics-informed dual-indicator reliability assessment framework based on Wiener processes. Two degradation indicators under consideration are frequency-related degradation caused by stiffness degradation and Q-factor degradation caused by damping degradation, for which corresponding physics-embedded stochastic degradation models are formulated. The two indicators are normalized and fused through a generalized weighted limit state function, where failure is defined as gyroscope-level performance failure. Closed-form reliability expressions are derived for linear limit states, while Monte Carlo simulation is used for nonlinear cases. Reduced-order multiphysics simulation cases, including a double-ended fixed beam and a cantilevered MEMS mass block, are used to demonstrate the mechanism-to-indicator-to-reliability modeling procedure. The results show that the proposed dual-indicator framework provides more balanced reliability assessment than single-indicator analysis under the simulation setting. The proposed method offers an alternative mechanism-informed approach for reliability analysis and lifetime prediction of other MEMS devices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: