This qualitative study examines how young urban women resist the three-child policy in China, highlighting the implications for gender and reproductive governance.
China’s shift from long-term birth restriction to the three-child policy has intensified public debate on reproduction, gendered expectations, and state intervention in private life. This study examines how young urban women in China articulate cross-field resistance to the state-led three-child policy through digital discourse and everyday practices. Drawing on critical discourse analysis of 562 posts from Sina Weibo and Douban (2021–2024) and in-depth interviews with 20 women aged 22–34, the analysis shows how online expressions and offline life strategies converge to challenge dominant pronatalist narratives. Findings reveal four interrelated dimensions of resistance: reframing family planning as a form of structural governance rather than a demographic necessity; politicizing reproductive decision-making as a site of gendered power struggle; foregrounding class-based critiques that expose the unequal distribution of reproductive and caregiving burdens; and constructing modes of female identity that move beyond the normative role of motherhood. Particular attention is given to the only child generation, who occupy a historically specific position both as beneficiaries of earlier gender-equality discourses and targets of intensified pronatalist expectations. Their simultaneous pursuit of individual development and heightened familial responsibilities amplifies the tensions embedded in contemporary reproductive governance. By conceptualizing these practices as a form of “integrated resistance”, the study demonstrates how young women negotiate limited political space to reshape reproductive subjectivity and contest state biopolitics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: