Demonstrates improved accuracy in vehicle trajectory tracking using LiDAR, indicating better traffic analysis outcomes.
Recent advances in roadside sensing technologies, including camera-based systems, radar, and LiDAR, have enabled high-resolution sampling of vehicle trajectories, overcoming the temporal and spatial limitations of traditional data collection methods. Among these, LiDAR sensing has been widely adopted for traffic monitoring and surrogate safety analysis due to its high spatial accuracy and temporal resolution. However, sensor noise and occlusion in roadside LiDAR frequently introduce tracking point offsets and trajectory discontinuities, reducing the reliability of vehicle counts, traffic state estimation, and conflict analysis. To address these challenges, this study proposes a post-processing method based on time–space analysis to detect and correct occlusion-induced trajectory discontinuities. By exploiting the inherent spatiotemporal consistency of vehicle movements, the proposed approach identifies fragmented trajectories, reconstructs continuous vehicle paths, and recovers realistic traffic patterns. Validated on real-world LiDAR data collected at an urban intersection in Reno, Nevada, across four 30 min traffic periods covering AM and PM peak conditions on weekdays and weekends, the proposed method achieves an average precision of 0.989 and an average F1-score of 0.948, outperforming IMM, GNN-RM, and HMM + Viterbi benchmark methods. Count accuracy improved from 85.5% to 97.4% across all evaluated periods, confirming the method’s effectiveness under occlusion conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dong et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: