Systematic review explores IL-6 gene variations and osteoarthritis risk, highlighting protective effects in specific populations.
Background: This study systematically evaluates the association between interleukin-6 (IL-6) gene polymorphisms and osteoarthritis (OA) risk using a systematic meta-analytic approach. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a literature search was conducted across multiple electronic databases, including studies published up to February 2025. Eligible studies included OA patients diagnosed by ACR criteria, that investigated IL-6 gene promoter polymorphisms (rs1800795, rs1800797, rs1800798) and reporting genotype data or odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All meta-analyses were performed using Stata 15.1, and subgroup analyses by ethnicity and OA subtype, as well as Egger’s publication bias tests, were conducted. Resultes: A total of 13 case-control studies (16 datasets) were included, covering three major IL-6 gene polymorphic sites: The 174 G/C (rs1800795) polymorphism showed no significant association with OA risk in overall or subgroup analyses (P > 0.05). The 572 G/C (rs1800797) polymorphism was significantly associated with a reduced OA risk under the dominant model (OR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.48–0.97, P < 0.05), with a particularly pronounced protective effect in knee OA (KOA). The 597 G/A (rs1800798) polymorphism showed no significant correlation with OA susceptibility (P > 0.05). Subgroup analyses confirmed result stability. Egger’s test detected no significant publication bias. Conclusion: IL-6 gene polymorphisms exhibit site- and population-specific effects on OA risk. The 572 G/C variant may confer protection against KOA. Further largescale, multicenter studies are needed to validate these findings and explore underlying mechanisms to facilitate early OA diagnosis and personalized interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: